CO129-615-4 Harbour craft used by Hong Kong Government- financial arrangements 30-1-1948 - 12-1-1949 — Page 8

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All

fell/

The Ministry of Transport's source of information is the reports of the Director of Marine, Hong Kong. It is pretty obvious therefore that the Hong Kong Government knows all about them and in (1) has been disingenuous. We do not want to involve Hong Kong in expenditure for craft about which no-one has raised any claim, but neither the Ministry of Transport nor we, having this information about Admiralty craft, can just say nothing about it.

As regards the Ministry of Transport claim, Mr. Jones said that his Ministry would be prepared to consider any arguments we wish to put forward in favour of a reduction of the amount and he left the impression that we should probably succeed in getting some reduction.

3. In discussion later with Mr. Palmer it was thought that, when we have the fuller information weare now asking for, we might well consider an approach to the Treasury asking for the claims (Ministry of Transport, Admiralty and all) to be entirely waived. This would of course be easier if we were able to adduce any reason for belief that the craft shown in categories (a) or (b) or even perhaps (c) of paragraph 2 of draft A, and did not fall, as seems unfortunately probable, in category (a). But even if it can be indisputably shown that they fall in category (d) (and it is by no means certain that this will be so), it still might be possible to persuade the Treasury to forego the price on general grounds- e. g.

e. g. that we are not asking for money to be paid out, that the early rehabilitation of the Colony, which demanded small craft, was in the ultimate interest of the United Kingdom, that it is a long time since these craft were handed over, that if the Hong Kong Government had not taken them their disposal on the other side of the world might have offered considerable difficulties and that, as regards the Admiralty craft, they seem to have been written off anyway.

The vaguer we can leave the origins of the craft the better chance we should have to persuade the Treasury, but if we had not done what we could to establish the facts of this matter the Treasury would certainly want to know why not, so we might as well do it now.

4. The fact that we have in mind an approach to the Treasury is of course an added reason why we cannot allow the possible Admiralty claims to lie unexamined, since any approach to the Treasury would obviously bring them to light.

5. One would like to tell Hong Kong what one has in mind, so as to explain our unseemly curiosity about the Admiralty craft, but it would not do to raise hopes which may be dashed, so we had better say nothing.

6. Mr. Jones agreed that there is no point in bringing in the Admiralty (still less the War office) at this stage and Mr.Palmer thought it possible that

it

Page

Page

amy

x as

recieres

cash

are

recounted for through

the bolonal Office for

it possible that it might never be necessary for us to bring them in, since he thought it might be that United KingdService Departments are no longer interested in recoveries of this nature from Colonial Governments.*

7.

Züm.

I showed be sutiful In

Supt. advice

as to whether

V-wallen

age 9

9

ref. para. 27 (14) + pere. 27(15), we thrill send the Treasury opies of Mr. A&B together with copies ) (13) and (8) and (1) We don't this slige wont get- morland in

argumen

with the

18.12.48.

Tresmy

On the scanty information available,

it appears that these vessels

the category of

Stores

buil Govt should pay

are

L

for which the

e.

stores

from the combatant services

There

is

---

taken over

Category (d)

however fast a

of the drafts. possibility that they may

me

A

of the category

cash adjustment (c. (as of the drafts)

cash adjustment

requied

ar

come

within

respect of which орговля is required.

LM

respect of which

has do

and

we

are

haping

be required (c. Hy or ces of

сов

we shall eventually

go to the Treasmy

an

for beer

never will its draft)

Rove

lo

adroad

this subject,

ine

west I think

and in view of No. 15,

of

let Treasury know the present portion.

mr Wallace agrees with bolk drafts.

any

Amendmast to

de fremer of

HT.B 21/12

age 9

Page

17

Jones M.O.T. We soft pe T-concureme

Page

age 10

23.12.4810

of Russell - Edmonds Try W/ 17.02nd, 4/1 puntando, 9/17-23.12.48

in

Spoken Ein. A. J. Jmes. He is writing

b

перед

= (17).

Meanwhile he

frees

& wine 7 Apr. I'gem

behind (^)) tolk, subject &

"There" for townds

subject & substitution 1 worde of the Ministry of Tranport

in lines

land

it will be necessary

27 pera. 6

tark

later the

Admiralty.

for?

In this the 2.0. (thechar

13/1

Isome s'gram.

19 totong Kong. Savy 1035 - (9)ansit.

1 Green

11/1 at me. Cons. 13 JAN 1949

20 Jones M.O.T.

H Russell - Edmonds Irsy

ymerę stamp

13.1.49

Н

1

age 10Page 11

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.